Skip to main content

WRITING TASK-2 (ESSAY TOPIC)

Task - 2

Some say you should always marry for love; others say that in an uncertain world it is wiser to marry for money.

 Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience

Sample Answer ▼

Marriage is certainly an important and life-changing phase in a human’s life. Some people opine that
one should marry the love of his life, whereas others hold the notion that one should marry a rich
person for the sake of certainty in life. I am a strong advocate of the viewpoint that love is the
foundation of any marriage. In this essay, I will discuss both points of views.

There are several pros of a love marriage. First and foremost, a strong bonding and affection between
two different persons are the two most important pillars of a strong relationship, which is very much
prominent within an adorable couple. A human come across many ups and downs throughout his life.
During tough situations, a person always has a consistent emotional support system from his motivating partner, that reduces the stress rate to half. Statistics have shown that the loneliness and unsuccessful relationships are among the major reasons for depression. Subsequently, people madly in love complement each other very well.

On the contrary, a marriage relying only on love may sometimes vanish when a couple couldn’t earn
enough money to manage their family needs such as paying bills or buying food. In such scenarios,
“marry for money” context seems to be appropriate.

To recapitulate, love is a strong and irreplaceable component of a healthy married life; however, money is an important factor for sustaining the married life. In my opinion, each person should make their independent vital contribution to financial expenses for the creation of a happy family.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WRITING TASK-2 (ESSAY TOPIC)

Task - 2 Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped.  Discuss both views and give your opinion. Sample Answer ▼ It is true that some people contend that economic growth is the only solution to the global problems of hunger and poverty. Others, however, argue for an end to economic growth in order to conserve our environment. I agree completely with this second view. Those who see economic growth alone as the sole cure for the tragedy of world hunger and poverty propose one major argument. Only the growth of the economies of the developing countries will provide the poor with the wealth to afford the basic necessities of life. The profits made by corporations who are responsible for this economic growth will trickle down in the form of financial benefits to be enjoyed by the starving and needy. This view has justified the age of imperialis...
Post a Comment
Read more

Speaking Cue Card

Speaking cue card Describe your favourite TV programme.  You should say: Which programme it is What it is about How often you watch it Explain why it is your favourite TV programme. HINT Follow-Up Questions Is watching TV a useful way to get relaxation? How do TV programs influence our society? What are the benefits and drawbacks of watching TV? It’s said that TV has reduced communication level among family members. Do you agree with this statement? What type of programs are more popular in your country? How many hours a day according to you should we watch TV? Does watching TV influence reading behavior of children yes or no and why? How many hours a day should a child watch TV?
Post a Comment
Read more

Reading (AR)

READING PASSAGE -1 The Great Australian Fence A war has been going on for almost a hundred years between the sheep farmers of Australia and the dingo, Australia’s wild dog. To protect their livelihood, the farmers built a wire fence, 3,307 miles of continuous wire mesh, reaching from the coast of South Australia all the way to the cotton fields of eastern Queensland, just short of the Pacific Ocean. The Fence is Australia’s version of the Great Wall of China, but even longer, erected to keep out hostile invaders, in this case hordes of yellow dogs. The empire it preserves is that of the woolgrowers, sovereigns of the world’s second largest sheep flock, after China’s - some 123 million head - and keepers of a wool export business worth four billion dollars. Never mind that more and more people - conservationists, politicians, taxpayers and animal lovers - say that such a barrier would never be allowed today on ecological grounds. With sections of it almost a hu...
Post a Comment
Read more