Skip to main content

WRITING TASK 2 (ESSAY TYPE :- Give your opinion)

Task 2

Should parents be obliged to immunise their children against common childhood diseases? Or do individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?

What is your view of this practice?


Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience.

Sample Answer ▼

It's a complicated problem. In general and in actual, parents make decisions of of immunising or not immunising for children from deadly diseases, they have to take the responsibility of children health. From my point of view, it must not be optional and all children have to be vaccinated.

We all know that children who are less than 6 or 7 age are vulnerable to diseases and should have fatal results or big problems in their forthcoming future life if they are not protected from heinous diseases. Though these childhood illnesses might seem very simple, parents must pay attention to their children who are at these ages. By the way, it must not be voluntary for parents to decide what they must do. It is also the future of the country and the nation in terms of having a strong nation. Namely, children comprise the basis of education in the country, so children have a bulk and vital role in the country in terms of education and future. For this reason, governments have to make something special for that, such as legislation. These sorts of regulations will make parents feel responsible for their children.

Children, who suffer from deadly diseases and get affected by that in future, actually start hating their parents. Think about how sad it would be when a child suffers from physical disability only because his parents decided not to vaccinate him in his childhood? That is something we never want to happen to our nation. Actually, there are also some families who want to immunise their children but haven't got sufficient budget to spend for that. In that way, governments have to undertake immunising such children and assign subsidies for those of children. People haven't got the rights not to vaccinate their children. This is not an option, this is a must. Because it is inhumane for both children and parents who might become the victim of deadly diseases. 


To sum up, parents must be responsible for their children and they mustn't choose to immunise or not immunise, that should be a must for parents.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Weekly Assignment (AC)

Line Graph Worksheet - Gap Fill The line graph illustrates the number of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007, in grams. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Gap Fill - Choose the correct word The graph shows the quantity of margarine, low-fat spreads, and butter consumed between 1981 and 2007. The quantities are measured in grams. Over the period 1981 to 2007 as a whole, there was  1.   ............................ in the consumption of butter and margarine and  2.  ...................................... in the consumption of low-fat spreads. Butter was the most popular fat at the beginning of the period, and consumption   3 . ........................................... of about 160 grams in 1986. After this, there was  4.   .......................................................... The consumption of margarine began lower than that for butter at 90 gra...

Writing-AC-Task-1 (TABLE)

Task 1 The tables below provide information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Sample Answer ▼ The table data illustrates per person potato consumption and total production of this crop in five different regions in the world- South and Central America, Africa, North America, Europe, and Asia, in 2016. According to the information provided, Europeans ate more potatoes than the citizens of other regions on an average and Asia harvested the largest quantity of potatoes in 2016. In details, Europeans were the chief consumers of potatoes in 2006 as each European ate 96.1 kilograms potatoes. Then, North America and Asia followed the second and the third highest consumer list of this crop, 57.9 and 25.8 kg per person intake respectively. It is interesting to note that an average European consumed almost the ...

Writing Task-1 (Bar Column Graph)-

Task 1 The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. - Show / Hide Sample Answer - The bar graph provides information on the number of elephants in different countries between 1997 and 2004. Generally speaking, in India and Myanmar, the maximum number of elephants inhabited and the total number of elephants decreased over time. As is presented in the bar graph, approximately 10 thousand elephants lived in India in 1997 which was the highest among the given countries. Myanmar is the second largest country for elephants’ dwelling. Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and China had about 1000 elephants in 1997 while Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Thailand had roughly 3000 elephants. The least number of elephants were in China in 1997. After 7 years, in 2004, the number of elephants in all countries decreased except in Laos. Th...